9/11 Pentagon Damage Immediate Aftermath High-Resolution Photos

Compare with:

9/11 Pentagon Damage High-Resolution Aerial Photos

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

The Pentagon in flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into building at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

The Pentagon in flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into building at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

The Pentagon in flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into building at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

The Pentagon in flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into building at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters and Department of Defense employee's organize a group to go in and find survivors moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames moments after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters work to put out the flames after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

Firefighters struggle to contain the fire, after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the Pentagon. Members of Al-Qaeda, a terrorist group of fundamentalist Muslims, hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, then deliberately impacted the Pentagon, killing all 64 passengers onboard and 125 people on the ground. (U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate First Class Dewitt D. Roseborough III.) (Released)

Firefighters work to put out the flames after a hijacked jetliner crashed into the Pentagon at approximately 0930 on September 11, 2001.

High angle view showing damage to the Western ring wall of the Pentagon Building after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

30 comments for “9/11 Pentagon Damage Immediate Aftermath High-Resolution Photos

  1. September 11, 2011 at 3:05 am

    No Plane wreckage or debris field with wings, engines or tail section. Let’s see the real time video of the “plane”hitting the pentagon, flying 15 feet off the ground going 600 miles an hour after executing a flight maneuver that veteran military pilots would be challenged to pull off. DOD released a time lapsed, heavily edited video of a white streak heading toward the building and then a fireball.We’re supposed to believe that flight school flunkies who could not fly a Cessna took control of a passenger jet and flew it around like a professional? The width of the plane should have chopped a much bigger hole into the side of the building. These are real questions being asked by an observant public. Why the coverup?

  2. Ron Conroy
    September 12, 2011 at 6:20 pm

    If there was infact a flight 77, had any airline claimed ownership, and if so, has there ever been a list of passengers released?
    I agree with anyone who feels that if the plane was a Boeing 757, there would have been many large pieces of the plane to survive the fire. Total consumption seems nearly impossible. A missile of some sort appears more likley to me and residue from the explosive surely could have been detected.

  3. Paul Hogg
    September 12, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    People like you make me sick. And I ll not even bother to argue wether it happened or not. Show respect for the people who lost there lives there for Christ sake

    • Ron Conroy
      September 13, 2011 at 4:17 am

      So, Paul, what you are saying is that people were murdered, but lets just leave it that and not try to find out who did it and why. Would you feel that way if a member of your family had been one of the victims? Would’t you agree that not looking for the people involved is showing more disrespect for the victims?
      Ron

  4. Tom Martin
    September 14, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    Whatever hit the Pentagon, it certainly wasn’t a 757. Nice try.

    • Doc Tom
      December 26, 2013 at 10:58 pm

      You’re right. It was a global hawk drone.

      • Some Guy on the Web
        April 7, 2014 at 4:30 am

        Global hawks are too small. It WAS American Airlines Flight 77, and it was a Boeing 757-200, whether you want to face it or not.

  5. Doug Ketcher
    September 16, 2011 at 4:57 am

    Hold on….what about the numerous people sitting in traffic on the highway next to the Pentagon who actually WITNESSED and REPORTED the aircraft fly over their cars and slam into the Pentagon??? No wait, they were in on it too… c’mon, really???…

    • Ronald Sansbury
      January 15, 2012 at 1:06 pm

      I don’t suppose anyone knows where the camera pictures that were compenscated from the Gas station across the way ended up! Where are they now???

    • DaveR
      December 26, 2013 at 11:37 pm

      So where’s the plane?

  6. Ronald Sansbury
    January 15, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    Thew engine, wheels and landing gear should have been there, (THEY DON”T BURN UP!!!!)

  7. Travis
    September 11, 2012 at 6:11 am

    I know where the camera footage went from the gas station across the road ! The bloody FBI took them

  8. September 26, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    i feel so sorry for eveyone who died

  9. Unsheepled
    September 30, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    What difference is between pentagon hit and wtc? One set of images over and over , the other never, WHY?
    The idiot who said it was disrespectful to ask for truth is thoroughly PROGRAMMED by tel-LIE-vision to repeat their mindless drivel America WTFU!

  10. Arthur D. Bradley
    September 30, 2012 at 5:50 pm

    POOR PICTURES. We needed to see some post-aftermath, aerial ,shots, on a clear day, showing how far in damage went. Those pictures show very little.

    • jason
      October 1, 2012 at 3:00 pm

      The U.S. government. Pure and simple.

      Do they want all this conspiracy talk to go away? Fine, RELEASE THE TAPES!! We have been saying this for years – release the pentagon tapes!! ALL OF THEM and IN FULL! Sorry for the caps but this gets bloody fustrating after so many years. I don’t expect people to accept the proof right away, but al least have a brain fucking operational enough to ask the right questions.

      • shropster
        October 1, 2012 at 4:14 pm

        CIA, FBI, Mosad, ?

  11. BimBam
    October 1, 2012 at 9:14 am

    So if this all be true, whose the real terrorist then?

  12. jason
    October 1, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    Whoever still believes a 757 hit the pentagon is completely without logic. I’m sorry, I cannot be sympathetic to those who refuse to open their minds. Where the hell is the hole that a MASSIVE 757 is suppose to create when entering a building? Where’s the holes where the engines are suppose to have impacted. Remember what the hole in WTC #1 and 2 looked like? Well, where is it here? In other pictures on the net, the plane is suppose to have impacted three rings in the building. Yet, at the last hole, no plane wreckage? Last point: WTC #1 – down into a pile of dust. WTC #2 – down in a plie of dust. WTC #7 (over 100 meters away from #’s 1 and 2 – same. YET, #’s 3 and 4 (DIRECTLY BELOW #’s 1 AND 2 respecitvely) although heavily damaged, REMAINED STANDING! (search for pics on the net) Debunkers, please explain how that is.

  13. Martin Norpell
    October 1, 2012 at 7:03 pm

    The photographs are dark on purpose. The small size of the impact hole supposedly made by a commercial airliner is concealed.
    One witness who crawled out of the opening in the wall said she saw no trace of airliner wreckage inside. But the offices where accountants were investigating the missing 3.5 trillion were totally destroyed. Go figure.

  14. Dan Wiberg
    October 1, 2012 at 11:04 pm

    The captions are very misleading. Most saying “Moments after a jet liner crashed” It more than an hour before the section collapsed.
    Calling an hour a “moment” is like calling a premature ejaculator a great lover.
    I noticed none of the pictures display the original 15 foot hole before the collapse, that a 100 foot plus wide jet liner supposedly passed through nor the undamaged signs and windows within a few feet of that hole.
    How about the undamaged furniture in offices adjacent to the collapse? Or the “wheel evidence” that was not from the associated jetliner.
    Or the near pristine section of fuselage with 3 windows showing no sign of melting or physical damage other than the sharp edges around the perimeter.
    The only video evidence provided to the people is that of a small pointy flying object too small to be the nosecone of a jet liner. And here it is 11 years later and Mr Moussoui still has not been brought to justice and the other videos are being held while we are told they would create unfair evidence of Mr Moussoui. Whatever happened to a “Fair and Speedy Trial”?
    What about the 6 hijackers who are still alive?
    Just wondering.

  15. Brian
    November 15, 2012 at 10:48 pm

    No matter what comparisons you want to draw…the WTC was not designed the same as the Pentagon. The Pentagon was built as a massive fortress and the WTC as a commercial high rise. I’m not saying your argument doesn’t have validity, but comparing just the buildings architecture and how they would respond to the same impact is really apples and oranges.

  16. badbeta
    January 27, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    Nice try Paul but the families believe it was an inside job and so do the first responders. Perhaps it might behoove you to go check out the families response to the 9/11 commissions’ report…they didn’t buy it for one second.

  17. Subluna
    July 7, 2013 at 3:01 am

    There were at least 80 video surveillance cameras in, around and opposite the Pentagon at 9/11.
    Why do we only get to see a few frames of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon?
    Why not show the world all of the footage of all the 80+ cameras? Because there was no plane hitting the Pentagon. If there was, the Americans would have shown all of the footage.
    This is withholding evidence, a criminal offence. But of course, the perpetrators of 9/11, the Israeli and US governments are above the law. They do invade and destroy other countries at will without any retribution.

  18. October 13, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    well if you still belive in .the government you must be mad just take a look the photos.the truth is right there for you to see

  19. fred.reade
    October 29, 2013 at 9:45 pm

    It’s funny to me that people can’t accept simple and obvious reality. The story in their head, their beliefs or their ego or fear blocks them from registering the simple and obvious truth. There is no plane. Anyone who claims the pix are too dark or at the wrong angle is simple deluding him/herself. A 757 is a large aircraft and the engines and landing gear are virtually indestructible. The seats, bodies, fueselage, tail-section, etc… Where is it? Come on people. Wake up. i’m not trying to convince anyone of any “theory,” just look at the pix and videos from people who responded. There’s no plane. Period.

  20. November 14, 2013 at 9:18 pm

    If you google this subject the first page or two are all sites trying to debunk the conspiracy theories. They actually contradict the theory of the 18ft hole by saying there was 90-100 ft of impact damage across the front of the building. So where’s the plane? The fuselage? Them engines were made of titanium. Amazing, but hey, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, remember? And 50 years on that hasn’t changed either.

  21. November 14, 2013 at 9:19 pm

    Mind you, knowing how Google is partners with the NSA, it’s hardly surprising that engine searches can be steered.

  22. David Clifton
    December 26, 2013 at 10:47 pm

    Spotless lawn.

    If a 745 went through a hole at ground level, its engines would have dug furrows in the lawn.

  23. Matt
    February 21, 2014 at 6:39 pm

    There is film footage of the planes flying into the World Trade Center buildings, but some conspiracy theorists deny that too. Some people don’t want to be convinced, would rather believe in some massive internal conspiracy than that some wealthy terrorist from overseas who said many times he wanted to inflict as much pain as possible on our country did what he said he was going to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *