This site has previously published a nearly complete record of all projects in Afghanistan under the CERP program. We highly recommend that people look at the raw information themselves to understand the massively vague and seemingly unaccountable nature of much of the spending. For those within the public, media, or academia who actually wish to view the raw information on a project by project basis, please see the following items:
- Afghanistan Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) Spending Data 2010-2011
- Complete Afghanistan Commander’s Emergency Response Program Project Data July 2009-August 2010
- (U//FOUO) Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) Handbook
- Government of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Development Projects Data 2010-2011
For other documents related to similar “aid programs” in Afghanistan and Iraq, please see the Money as a Weapon System (MAAWS) guides:
In Afghan hands, aid projects neglected (Washington Post):
Roads, canals and schools built in Afghanistan as part of a special U.S. military program are crumbling under Afghan stewardship, despite steps imposed over the past year to ensure that reconstruction money is not being wasted, according to government reports and interviews with military and civilian personnel.
U.S. troops in Afghanistan have spent about $2 billion over six years on 16,000 humanitarian projects through the Commander’s Emergency Response Program, which gives a battalion-level commander the power to treat aid dollars as ammunition.
A report slated for release this month reveals that CERP projects can quickly slide into neglect after being transferred to Afghan control. The Afghans had problems maintaining about half of the 69 projects reviewed in eastern Laghman province, according to the audit by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).
The spending in Afghanistan is part of the $5 billion provided to U.S. military commanders for projects in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2004. The new report is the latest to identify shortcomings and missteps in the program, whose ventures have included the Jadriyah Lake park in Iraq, planned as a water park but now barren two years after a U.S. military inauguration ceremony.
The dilapidated projects in Afghanistan could present a challenge to the U.S. strategy of shifting more responsibility to Afghans. Investing in infrastructure, notes President Obama’s December review of the war, “will give the Afghan government and people the tools to build and sustain a future of stability.”
“Sustainment is one of the biggest issues with our whole strategy,” said a civilian official who shared details from a draft of the audit. “The Afghans don’t have the money or capacity to sustain much.” The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the Defense Department is preparing a response to the audit.
Costly civilian plans sputter in Iraq (UPI):
The wreckage of a Baghdad water park symbolizes failed U.S. efforts to win over Iraqis with civilian projects, some commanders say.
The Jadriyah Lake park by the Tigris River was opened with fanfare in August 2008 and drew large crowds for the rest of the year, The Washington Post reported Monday.
But religious authorities objected, and by the next spring, the local power supply was reduced, the water pumps stopped and the lake dried up. Today, much of the compound is in ruins.
The park was among the projects funded by the $5 billion Commander’s Emergency Response Program, which was intended counter extremism. But U.S. auditors have said the program has been used for expensive boondoggles of doubtful value. Often, the Iraqi government had no say in the ventures and has refused to keep them going.
Even some U.S. commanders are beginning to question the fund, seeing little evidence that the millions pumped into Iraq — and now Afghanistan — have achieved its goals.