(U//FOUO) DHS-FBI Suspicious Activity Reporting Bulletin: Acquisition of Expertise

ROLL CALL RELEASE

  • 1 page
  • For Official Use Only
  • October 5, 2012

Download

(U//FOUO) Terrorists may attempt to gain skills and knowledge necessary to plan and execute attacks by obtaining specialized training, soliciting or stealing technical and proprietary information, or reaching out to academics and experts. In 2007, German police arrested three terrorist suspects for allegedly planning and preparing car bomb attacks against US citizens and interests in Germany. The suspects traveled to Pakistan where they received weapons and explosives training from a Pakistan-based Uzbek jihadist group called the Islamic Jihad Union.

(U//FOUO) The following SAR incidents from the NSI shared space demonstrate types of behavior terrorists might exhibit during pre-operational stages for attacks. While none were ultimately linked to terrorist activity, they are cited as relevant examples for awareness and training purposes:

– (U//FOUO) A university professor of cellular and molecular biology reported receiving an e-mail with a request for information about producing and disseminating a bacterial toxin. The individual requesting the information claimed to be working on an academic assignment, but would not disclose the university she represented or the details of her assignment

– (U//FOUO) An employee of an aerospace engineering consulting company received a call from an individual seeking to understand how to construct a box that could shield terahertz frequencies, which are used in mail screening and imaging to detect hidden objects and determine chemical and bio-agent composition.

(U) Possible Indicators of Suspicious Attempts to Acquire Expertise

(U//FOUO) The following activities can indicate efforts to acquire expertise for potentially illicit purposes.  Depending upon the context of the situation–reason for seeking the information, personal behaviors, and other indicators–suspicious inquiries should be reported to the appropriate authorities.

– (U//FOUO) Inquiries by individuals with no apparent need for technical or scientific knowledge that may lead to exploitation of vulnerabilities.
– (U//FOUO) Possession of blue prints, architectural diagrams, and facility information by individuals with no demonstrated need for the information
– (U//FOUO) Extensive research on a subject, such as explosive-making methodologies and guidance, which would arouse suspicion in a reasonable person.
– (U//FOUO) Seeking weapons training and conducting paramilitary exercises, particularly by individuals who are unwilling to provide an explanation for acquiring combat skills.

(U//FOUO) First Ammendment-protected activities should not be reported in a SAR or ISE-SAR absent articulable facts and circumstances that support the source agency’s suspicion that the behavior observed is not innocent, but rather reasonably indicative of criminal activity associated with terrorism, including evidence of pre-operational planning related to terrorism. Race, ethnicity, national origin, or religious affiliation should not be considered as factors that create suspicion (although these factors may be used in specific subject descriptions).

Share this:

facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

1 comment for “(U//FOUO) DHS-FBI Suspicious Activity Reporting Bulletin: Acquisition of Expertise

  1. Jay
    October 26, 2014 at 2:43 am

    Hi Tom,I have always ejynoed your blogs and your asktom site. They are both interesting and useful. However, one of my pet peeves is that you tick off people for what you deem inappropriate usage of the English language such as ‘U’ for ‘You’ and ‘wud’ for ‘Would’. While that is perfectly allright, I would also like you to show the same diligence when editing your work. I could at random pick at least two errors :Error 1: ‘Some of the floats where cool’ – Should be’ Some of the floats were cool ‘Error 2: ‘Even got to do a small amount of site seeing in New York before taking off’Should be ‘Even got to do a small amount of sight seeing in New York before taking off’For the record, while I find ‘U’, ‘cud’ and ‘wud’ mildly irritating, I recognize that it is part of the evolution of the language itself. If the English language did not evolve, we would still be saying ‘Methinks’ instead of ‘I think’ etc.The point I try to make is that a language is not immutable and adapts itself to various usages and the cultural and historical context. For greater insights I would strongly recommend ‘The Language Instinct’ and ‘Words and Rules’ by the Harvard Professor Steven Pinker. My gentle suggestion to you: In future, go easy on the language deviants as they may be the trendsetters for the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *