Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virology Update

Cox-(2)

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting

  • Nancy Cox, PhD and Alexander Klimov, PhD
  • Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
  • July 23, 2009

IMMUNITY TO 2009 H1N1 VIRUS RESULTING FROM PRIOR INFLUENZA INFECTION OR VACCINATION WITH SEASONAL INFLUENZA VACCINE IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS (NEJM submitted)

• Less than 4% of individuals born during or after 1980 exhibited preexisting, cross-reactive, neutralizing antibody titers of ≥40 to the pandemic virus, whereas 34% of individuals born prior to 1950 had titers of ≥80

• Vaccination with recent seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV), resulted in a >4-fold rises in cross-reactive antibody to the pandemic virus in

– only ~2% of children aged 6 months to 9 years,
– 12-22% of adults aged 18-64 years, and
– <5% or less of adults aged >60 years

• Seasonal TIV with adjuvant induced similar cross-reactive antibody responses; no increase in cross-reacting antibody to pandemic H1N1 virus

• All 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses are antigenically similar to A/California/7/2009

• Minor genetic variability

• No evidence of reassortment with seasonal or H5N1viruses

• Resistant to M2 blockers

• Sensitive to NI (oseltamivir and zanamavir)

– Oseltamivir-resistant documented (4 of 5 after treatment or prophylaxis)

• Vaccination with contemporary seasonal influenza vaccines, with or without an adjuvant, induces little or no cross-reactive antibody to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus in any age group

– Individuals <30 years of age are serologically “naïve”

– A proportion of older adults appear to have pre-existing, cross-reactive antibodies

• Genetic and antigenic characterization of viruses, serologic assays, animal models, and epidemiologic assessments -all critical components for public health risk assessment

– Substantial consistency between laboratory and epidemiologic results
– Suggest novel H1N1 may not be fully adapted to humans

• Epidemiologic and virologic surveillance are important for identification of future changes in

– Antigenic characteristics
– Transmission characteristics
– Severity of disease
– Antiviral resistance
– Intensity (surge) in US cases

• Limited understanding of diversity of influenza viruses in pigs globally is a major gap in pandemic preparedness

– USDA’s efforts to initiate surveillance should be supported and encouraged by public health, putting “One Health” concept into action
– Ensuring virus sharing public health, animal health, academia and industry is a key component of pandemic planning

swsw2sw3sw4sw5sw6

Share this:

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail