DoJ Terrorism and Criminal Extremism Terms and Concepts Guide
August 24, 2010 in Department of Justice
Bureau of Justice Assistance
- 120 pages
- Law Enforcement Sensitive
- © 2005–2009 Institute for Intergovernmental Research®
In order for criminal justice professionals to effectively combat terrorism/extremism, it is imperative to obtain as much information as possible. Extremist groups often develop languages of their own. Some have created terms that are unique in the English language, while others have given new or expanded meaning to relatively common words and phrases. In addition, certain symbols, events, organizations, and individuals have particular significance for members of some extremist organizations, none of which may be familiar to an investigator or prosecutor who has not previously been involved with such cases.
Investigating Terrorism and Criminal Extremism—Terms and Concepts is a glossary designed primarily as a tool for criminal justice professionals to enhance their understanding of words relating to extremist terminology, phrases, activities, symbols, organizations, and selected names that they may encounter while conducting criminal investigations or prosecutions of members of extremist organizations. Included are terms that may be germane to members of an extremist movement. Also defined are words that are singularly employed by specific extremist groups. Legal terms that have been given new meanings by groups’ adherents are also defined. Similarly, certain terms that describe activities and tactics commonly undertaken by extremists are also included. Significant groups, organizations, movements, and publications that are important for an understanding of terrorism/extremism in the United States and that may be encountered by law enforcement officers and prosecutors are also documented. Inasmuch as this publication is primarily intended to define terms, individuals indexed by name are limited in occurrence. However, there are some people who are of such importance to certain segments of the extremist movement that their very names are equated with that cause. Therefore, some of the better-known terrorists are included.
The key criterion for inclusion of a term, phrase, or name in this publication is the likelihood that investigators and prosecutors may encounter it during the scope of their duties. The fact that an entry appears in this publication does not imply a connection to illegal activity. As an example, the location Waco, Texas, appears in the glossary. Investigators may hear reference to this location while working on certain antigovernment cases. Many terms and names appear under one or more individual entries. For this reason, a concerted effort was made to create a thorough index, allowing for a comprehensive search of terms of interest.
…
Related posts:
- Domestic Extremism Lexicon
- Rightwing Extremism
- U.S. DOJ-FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy 2011 Draft
- BP Bought “Oil Spill” Search Terms to Direct Users to Official Website
- New York State Law Enforcement Terrorism Indicators Reference Card
- Texas Prisons Gang Dictionary
- (U) US-Based Street Gangs a Potential Recruiting Pool for Terrorist Groups
- California Weapons of Mass Destruction and Terrorism Awareness for Security Professionals Course Workbook and Guide
This is pure madness!!!
Well hell, I guess we’re ALL terrorists now…
So, I don’t loaded in PDF file, and you didn’t give the password.
Of course, that’s what we’ve said that this was leading to all along. The enemy of freedom has made anyone that wants to be free a terrorist. Who didn’t know that that was coming? That’s exactly what Hitler and the Occult Nazis did.
Nothing new here. The enemies of freedom are all in the gov’t mafia now. Now what do we do? They’re not going to fight fair are they? Do they have rules that they obey? No, they only have one rule and that that they will rule no matter what or who you vote for.
All part of living in a “free” country. Go Paylun!
This document is in and of itself, the epitome of criminal extremism.
So the bilderbergs, CFR and the trilateral commision, in which certain members of our elected representation illegally meet in secret to plan world events that time and again go against the will and best interests of the American People is just fine and dandy, but Americans who oppose all this get labled as “patriots”…hmmmm, this list couldnt have been written by these same forces, could it have been?…lol
Peace, in-spite of the liars, like these guys, who would have it otherwise.
i particularly like the way they put the “tax-protest movement” as a right wing movement started in the 50′s/60′s who not only want to avoid paying taxes, but claim they should not have to pay them…
excuse me? isn’t that what the anti-war/left wing movement is? those who work under the table, or not at all, so they don’t have to pay taxes (under the auspices: “we’re not going to pay for any war…” so, everyone who DOES pay their taxes will have to pay for the anti-war/anti-military’s welfare, and now obamacare…. DUH!)
this is laughable!
Isaiah 5:20
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Proverbs 17:15
He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD.
Romans 14:16
Let not then your good be evil spoken of:
Proverbs 15:3
The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.
Ecclesiastes 12:14
For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
Proverbs 17:13
Whoso rewardeth evil for good, evil shall not depart from his house.
Speaking of extremism, how about the “Patriot” Act?
Awesome, thank you Barack Obama for standing up to these FUCKERS.
It is a damn shame that “certain” government officials cannot seem to differentiate between citizens that believe in upholding the constitutional framework that this country was founded on and true fanatical extremists that “truly” desire anarchy and civil disruption.
If you go to the “Y” section you’ll see that the names of my God and the Messiah are listed as terms used by terrorists and extremists… but if you go to the “A” section there is no mention of Allah. This should prove two things: 1. That there is no REAL Islamic terrorist threat (aka Al-CIA-duh) hence stuff like NY Mosque is a manufactured crisis/distraction, and 2. The real target of anti-terror legislation is American Christians.
I would like to add another entry to the “Terms and Concepts.” oxymoron: Department of Justice.